Own the quality bar for human evaluations at a fast-scaling AI company transforming legal services.
Posted by employer 2 months ago
First seen on Joblaze 2 months ago
Last verified on the company career page 17 hours ago
Skills & Technologies
AI in the day-to-day
Comfort with interpreting evaluation data, natively or with AI tool support.
Requirements
Not disclosed in this posting: visa sponsorship.
Joblaze summary
The Senior Product Operations Manager for Evaluation Quality at Harvey AI is responsible for establishing and maintaining high standards for human evaluations, ensuring that outputs are reliable and actionable for product and engineering teams. This role requires expertise in quality assurance processes, evaluation methodologies, and the ability to train and calibrate a distributed team of contract attorneys. Ideal candidates will have significant experience in product or research operations, particularly in complex, expert-driven environments, and should be comfortable working closely with legal domain experts. Harvey AI is in a rapid growth phase, emphasizing a culture of decisiveness and
Joblaze insights
Quick facts
From the original posting
We’re looking for a senior operator to own the quality bar behind Harvey’s human evaluations. As we scale globally, the volume of eval work is growing 10x, but volume only matters if the output is trusted. This role makes Human Data’s signal decision-grade: rigorous, calibrated, and reproducible enough that Product, Engineering, and AI Research act on it to ship.
As a member of our Evaluation Operations team, you’ll work alongside our Evaluation Operations Manager (who runs throughput and coordination) and partner closely with Applied Legal Researchers, Product, Engineering, and AI Research. You'll set the standard for what "good" looks like across eval data and methodology, and own the data analyses to make conclusions that teams will rely on, building the stakeholder trust that lets EPD act on the signal.
Own the quality bar for Harvey’s human evaluations: define what “good” looks like for eval methodology and data analysis, and produce decision-grade outputs for EPD
Author and maintain the evaluation guidelines, instructions, and databases that contract attorneys work from
Standardize and streamline rubric and evaluation design into repeatable templates and one documented methodology, partnering with Applied Legal Research (ALR), who supplies feature-specific legal depth
Own contract-attorney quality: onboarding, calibration training, inter-rater reliability, and the feedback loop (including benchmarks and gold references) that keeps judgment consistent across attorneys and over time
Conducting quantitative and qualitative statistical analyses, diagnosing error states, investigating root causes, and turning raw eval results into a structured, prioritized signal Product and ALR can act on
Run QA on vendor and contract-attorney deliverables against a defined bar before results inform a launch decision
Ensure the quality bar holds across jurisdictions and non-English geographies as coverage expands
Establish one standard, documented way to analyze eval results, and build lightweight operational dashboards to track rater capability and eval-program health
Support ALR in a review step that certifies an evaluation is sound before it scales to contract attorneys
Partner with ALR and Analytics to determine where human eval aligns with online signal and where it can provide expanded insights
6+ years in product operations, research operations, evaluation/QA operations, or quality program management
A track record of owning quality inputs (guidelines, instructions, benchmarks, QA procedures) for complex, expert-driven or human-in-the-loop work
Experience onboarding, training, and calibrating a distributed pool of expert raters, annotators, or reviewers, and running the feedback loop that improves their quality over time
Enough grounding in measurement concepts (calibration, inter-rater reliability, sampling, rubric design) to independently set up and own the quality of our evaluation loop yourself
Experience with running quantitative and qualitative data analyses, interpreting and running statistical tests on evaluation data (natively or with AI tool support), and communicating conclusions to various stakeholders
A record of scaling and streamlining evaluation quality processes under shipping pressure, with a bias toward documentation and reproducibility over one-off analysis
Ability to work deeply with domain experts (e.g., ALR / lawyers) and translate nuanced judgment into repeatable, documented standards
Strong cross-functional coordination across Product, Engineering, Research, ALR, and data providers/vendors
Clear communicator who can build credibility and trust with stakeholders
Bias to action and high ownership, from writing the guideline to auditing a vendor batch line by line
Experience in legal tech or working with domain experts in regulated industries
Experience owning quality across multiple markets, languages, or jurisdictions
Built calibration, inter-rater reliability, or capability-tracking systems for annotation or evaluation pipelines
Experience transitioning evaluation work in-house or otherwise improving evaluation ROI
Familiarity with LLM-as-judge / automated evaluation used alongside human eval
Early employee at a hyper-growth startup, or experience at a world-class product or platform operations org
$155,400 - $233,200 USD
#LI-CD1
Standard company text repeated across Harvey AI's postings is omitted here.